Lance Watson
California Maritime Academy
lancewat@gmail.com

Review of The Rights and Responsibilities of the Modern University

Bickel, R.D., & Lake, P.F. (1999). The Rights and Responsibility of the Modern University: Who Assumes the Risk s of College Life?. Durham: Carolina Academic Press.

Institutions of higher education have evolved when it comes to issues of student rights and safety and should seek continued opportunities to learn more about these areas.  As society becomes more litigious, administrators and practitioners should work to better understand the effects law and liability have on their institution. The Rights and Responsibilities of the Modern University provides historical perspective on the legal evolution of institutional responsibility for its students as well as provides current models and best practices for administrators and practitioners.

The text traces the legal and historical progression of responsibility within an institutional setting. Beginning with in loco parentis, the book discusses the universities’ initial limitless power over students and its substantial protection from legal repercussions. However, as students began to sue institutions and win their cases, the concept of individual student freedom arose within the university. In response, institutions took a “bystander” approach, in which universities were no longer liable for student injury because of courts viewing students as completely free, uncontrollable entities acting within the institutional setting. This perspective alleviates any liability or responsibility of an institution to regulate and preserve campus safety.

However, this “hands off” approach is soon changed as communities and students seek to partner with institutions to ensure the security of the members of the campus community. What evolves is an “institutional duty to care” along with a balanced view of institutional authority and student rights culminating in a shared vision of responsibility.  Finally, we reach the current “facilitator model” found today in higher education. Within this model, universities, students, and the courts collaborate to ensure that effective higher education law is developed while empowering administrative oversight and fostering student self-accountability regarding safety. This contemporary model is perhaps what most influences current practices within higher education today.

On a functional level, the text is written in such a way that any practitioner may read it and gain an in depth understanding of the legal issues pervading higher education today. Bickel and Lake intentionally use simple terms and a multitude of easily understandable examples so that any practitioner can understand the issues discussed without the having previous legal knowledge. The text is easily read through the authors’ conversational style of writing in which one feels more as if you are being told a winding, historical-narrative of case law. With this narrative, the reader is able to overview the entire proceedings of a lawsuit (from inception to findings) and gain a deep understanding of the origins and rationale behind the orders of the courts. Additionally, Bickel and Lake insert a dry humor and wry honesty concerning the legal development of higher education that allows for an often needed break in the gravity of some of the concepts presented within the text.

Beyond the functionality of the text, practitioners are encouraged through its reading to further examine their own institutions and their actions concerning student rights and safety.  The concept of “duty to care” has become a critical issue within today’s student affairs practice. However, this phrase may be used without complete understanding of its meaning or how to best practice it. Through reading the text, a practitioner may gain further insight into the duty one is obligated to perform within today’s legal and institutional paradigm. 

At a glance, one may initially feel that this book is dated due to its 1999 publication date. However, the history and case studies within the text supplies concrete direction for contemporary practice. The text provides perspective on the origins of higher education’s “legal landscape” in which a practitioner must remain vigilant and perform their duties in an effective, safe, and responsible manner. Bickel and Lake predicted the legal era in which student affairs currently exists and offer case studies that pre-date their actual practice. The Rights and Responsibilities of the Modern University offers easy to understand insight that any practitioner may used to lead the field into a future in which we further actualize a mutually beneficial relationship between students, courts, and the institution.



Helen Diamond Steele
Clemson University
helens@clemson.edu

Diversity: More than Just a Black and White Issue

Black and white are synonymous with simplicity. Black and white photographs, piano keys, and tuxedos are elegantly simple. Black and white issues are simplistic, without the complexity of other shades. The issue of race, however, is not so simplistic.

The phrase browning of America is used to illustrate the increasing mix of cultural, racial, and ethnic identities in the United States (Rodriguez, 2002). This phenomenon has received increasing media attention with the rise of mixed race celebrities like Tiger Woods, Halle Berry, Vin Diesel, and Mariah Carey, whose images appeal to “a younger, more multicultural and multiracial generation” (Dagbovie, 2007, p. 232). Recently, President Barack Obama has brought race, specifically mixed race, to the political forefront (Babington, 2008). The browning of America complicates the previously black and white picture of race in the United States.

Census Bureau data indicates that the mixed race population in the United States is growing. The racial classification system used by the United States Census Bureau adheres to the guidelines issued by the Office of Management and Budget, which provides standards on ethnic and racial categories for statistical reporting to be used by all Federal agencies. After the 1990 census, these categories faced criticism from individuals who asserted that the categories did not reflect the increasing diversity of the American population that has resulted primarily from growth in immigration and interracial marriages (Office of Management and Budget, 1997). Census Bureau data show that the number of children living in mixed race families has been increasing in the past two decades.

After noting evidence of increasing numbers of children from interracial marriages and the need to measure the increased diversity in the United States, the Office of Management and Budget decided to allow individuals to select one or more races on the United States Census forms (Office of Management and Budget, 1997). Prior to this decision, most efforts to collect data on race, including those by the Census Bureau, allowed people to report only one race (Office of Management and Budget, 1997). The 2000 United States Census was the first census that collected tabulated data on people reporting two or more races. The standard racial categories now include the following: White alone, Black or African American alone, American Indian or Alaska Native alone, Asian alone, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander alone, some other race alone, and 57 possible combinations of these six categories (United States Census Bureau, 2001). Consequently, data will be shown for 63 racial categories, which do not conform to any biological, anthropological, or genetic criteria but instead reflect a social construction of race recognized in the United States of America (United States Census Bureau, 2001). These policy changes reflect the United States government’s recognition of the increased racial diversity in America. United States citizens now have the ability to identify with more than one race, and there are many colorful shades that may now be acknowledged due to the policy changes regarding racial classification. Literally, race is not simply Black and White.

The revisions to the standards for classification of Federal data on race and ethnicity and the growing number of multiracial students, faculty, and staff will have huge impacts on higher education. Current data indicate that an increasing number of multiracial students will be entering higher education. Of the 6.8 million people who indicated more than one racial category on the 2000 U.S. Census, 40 percent were under eighteen years old, predicting an increase in the number of multiracial students attending higher education in the coming years (Jaschik, 2006).

Institutional policies and practices can have an impact on the ways in which students, faculty, and staff engage in the campus environment. Because Federal policies and, therefore, institutional practices have reflected a monoracial construction of race, race-based policies and programs for higher education are primarily based on the needs and interests of monoracial students (Kellogg, & Niskode, 2008). For example, campus support offices for students of color are often organized around monoracial concerns, such as Black, Asian, Hispanic/Latino, and Native American issues (Kellogg, & Niskode, 2008). Similarly, student organizations are often centered on individual racial or ethnic groups, such as the Black Student Alliance or Hispanic Organization for Leadership and Achievement. Colleges and universities should ensure that their organizational structures support the needs of increasingly diverse campus communities, including the growing number of multiracial students. Faculty and staff should work to empower this growing population by reconceptualizing diversity to include multiracial issues, which may also improve the campus climate and learning opportunities for everyone (Kellogg, & Niskode, 2008).

To serve all academic community members effectively, higher education administrators and student affairs professionals should have an understanding of national policies regarding racial and ethnic classification and its impact on how campuses collect and maintain data on race and ethnicity. Furthermore, institutions of higher education must consider the needs of the growing multiracial population when developing policies and programs and prepare campus communities for the rapidly changing landscape in which students, faculty, and staff will live and learn.

References

See printable version
SOUTH CAROLINA COLLEGE
PERSONNEL ASSOCIATION

designed with Homestead
Spring 2010

Research in Brief:

The Effects of Toxic Media Messages on Women’s Health
by Callie Boyd, Lindsay Krcelic & Monica Ryskamp

Diversity: More than Just a Black and White Issue
by Helen Diamond Steele

Articles:

Interculturalism as a Foundation for Helping Students Value Diversity
by Carrie DuPre

Reviews:

Review of The Rights and Responsibilities of the Modern University
by Lance Watson







Callie Boyd
AnMed Health
calliegboyd@charter.net

Lindsay Krcelic
Clemson University
lkrceli@clemson.edu

Monica Ryskamp
Department of Veterans Affairs
MLRYSKAMP@gmail.com


The Effects of Toxic Media Messages on Women’s Health

Explanation of Problem

In today’s society, young women are constantly inundated with mixed messages regarding body image via music, video, movies, and other forms of media (Groesz, Levine, & Murnen, 2002).  Many of these media messages are promoting an idealistic female body image.  Research shows that exposure to images depicting the slender female ideal, relative to exposure to average-sized or neutral images, has consistent negative effects on some females’ levels of body dissatisfaction; specifically, females with existing body image concerns are most likely to experience adverse effects (Groesz, Levine, & Murnen, 2002).

Further research has revealed that sociocultural models have connected the growth of body image dissatisfaction and eating disorders to exposure to media messages of the idealistic female body image (Thompson, Heinberg, Altabe, & Tantleff-Dunn, 1999). The ideal body for a female is portrayed in media as slender and young, with long legs and well-developed female attributes (Levine &  Smolak, 1998). This desirable image is something that women believe they must achieve, with no regard to the fact that the media edits images. Even brief encounters with body-related images are likely to produce automatic affective responses in young women irrespective of body-related concerns (Watts, Cranney, & Gleitman, 2008).  In university students, the perfectionist mentality is influenced greatly by media with respect to other populations (Simon, et. al, 2009).

Clemson University women are not exempt from being pressured by similar media messages.  This paper outlines on-campus research that led us to the conclusion that a series of events tailored for women at Clemson University to reveal the truth regarding female body image, self-esteem, and media messages was necessary to combat these media messages.  This week of events was the first of its kind in South Carolina and will positively impact college-aged women.  This week proved successful, and it could serve as a model for other universities.  We heard from students that bringing attention to the media messages regarding self-esteem and body image was positive for women at Clemson.  Female students gained a greater appreciation for themselves as a result of these events. A few females cited that they had not realized how much they were personally influenced by media messages. Students were excited about the opportunity to showcase their appreciation for influential women by giving these women flowers. We even heard some students ask for additional flowers.

Researching the Problem at Clemson University

The purpose of our study was to evaluate electronic media in the forms of music, lyrics, and music videos for criteria that promotes healthy and unhealthy messages, images, self-esteem, and body image in women ages 18-24.  In order to assess the climate of Clemson University women with regard to how the media affects their body image and self-esteem, we facilitated focus groups. It was important to use focus groups because they provided a small and relaxed environment for open discussion. For each focus group, we chose three songs from a local popular radio station, likely recognized by the students, to present to the groups three times: once in the audio form, once in the visual form of a video, and once in a visual form of typed lyrics.  After each media form was presented, students were asked to answer a series of questions and we recorded their reactions. 

We selected the top three downloaded songs for Thursday, November 29, 2007: Low by Flo Rida featuring T-Pain, No One by Alicia Keys, and Apologize by Timbaland featuring OneRepublic. Participants were recruited via a popular website, Facebook. Each focus group was held in an academic classroom and lasted no longer than an hour and thirty minutes. In order to maintain continuity between each focus group, the same research student facilitated each session using a prepared script and the other two student facilitators recorded feedback similar to each previous session. A few of the sample questions that we asked included the following:

A total of 15 females participated in the three focus groups. It was important that we invited a diverse group of participants. As a result, we recruited females from every academic class year, as well as from multiple demographic backgrounds. Though diversity was important to us, based on our participant confidentiality, the demographic information of each participant cannot be documented or distributed.

There were many themes that were identified from coding the information based on participant discussion, with two main themes emerging. The majority of participants found the popular music they tend to listen to most as depressing and degrading toward women. These songs also evoked strong emotions such as anxiety and confusion, along with a lack of awareness about the negativity within the music and the embellishment of negative influences in order to put them in a more positive light. As these themes continued to emerge, the need for a creative intervention became clearer and the opportunity to influence the female perception of these media messages became necessary.

Combating the Problem

Based on our findings, we realized that Clemson University female students are not exempt from being pressured by media messages.  To help combat these pressures, we developed and hosted the Women’s Awareness Week, a collection of events that provided positive messages for college-aged women.  Before creating a schedule of opportunities available for our week, we reached out to student organizations and clubs, Clemson University’s Fike Recreation Center, health promotions, and other areas across campus that often lacked the resources for their own promotion of female-specific services.  Additionally, we contacted University departments and student groups to learn about events they already had planned for the week of April 13-17, 2009.  The result was a schedule of empowering and female-tailored events and services across campus.  Our motto for the week was “to be extraordinary everyday” and we created the following schedule with themed days:

Monday
“Be Good to Your Body”
Women’s nutrition experts available in the dining halls

Tuesday
“Play It Safe”
Attend “Sex in the 21st Century: Can We Talk?,” a seminar on domestic violence and sexual assault.

Wednesday
“Take Care of Your Body”
Enjoy a free fitness assessment at Fike Recreation Center, and attend a tour on how to use the fitness equipment.  The free fitness assessments were available all week. 

Thursday
“Love What You See”
Dare to Bare: exude self-confidence and shorten your morning routine by going all natural.  Wear your free t-shirt that says “love yourself from the inside out.”

Friday
“Love the Women that Impact our Lives”
Pick up a free flower on campus in appreciation for being an extraordinary woman.

To prepare and advertise for the week, we consulted a graphic designer to create fliers that included a distinguished Women’s Awareness Week logo and the opportunities available on campus throughout the week. We used this logo to link the various events and services available over the course of the themed week and we posted the fliers with this logo at numerous popular student locations.   Additional advertising efforts included strategic communication through email with partners across campus that had expressed an interest in women’s issues.  Partners included sororities, the Women’s Leadership Conference Board, and the Women’s Commission of Clemson.

We assessed each event on the schedule separately.  Our plans to have a representative from Redfern Student Health Center in the dining halls on Monday were unable to materialize due to scheduling conflicts. On Tuesday, over 120 attendees came to the “Sex and the 21st Century: Can We Talk?” discussion, and 25 women completed surveys after the presentation. From comments on the survey assessments, many attendees felt empowered by the speakers to confront personal issues and further the discussion of domestic violence across Clemson University’s campus.  Students explained their lack of awareness of domestic violence issues, their personal desire to influence these occurrences on campus, and the desire to inform their peers about domestic violence. On Wednesday, five students received the fitness assessment at Fike Recreation Center, and two students learned to properly use the exercise equipment through equipment tours.  In comparison to average weekly participation rates, fitness personnel were impressed with the number of students who received fitness assessments and tours. 

Thursday and Friday were our most successful days.  We had approximately 108 women receive “love yourself from the inside out” T-shirts to wear on Thursday.  These T-shirts were printed and worn inside out with this phrase printed on the front.  Many women responded that wearing the T-shirt and going make-up free spurred awareness of inner beauty through conversations.  After the week ended, we placed an extra order for T-shirts requested by an additional 26 women showing a continued interest in this message.  On Friday, 500 carnations were distributed for students to give to women in order to show their appreciation.  Each flower had a note card attached that read, “Thank you for being an extraordinary woman.”  Female students, faculty, and staff received flowers.  When distributing the flowers, we received overwhelmingly positive responses from women. Many students were excited about sharing their flower with their mom, friend, coworker, and teacher. One student said, “This is great! I can’t wait to see the expression on my professors’ face when she realizes what this flower stands for.” Many students asked for additional flowers to give away saying that one was just not enough.

Lessons Learned

We continue to hear of interest and talk on campus about the message of the week.  After reflecting on the week, we deemed the week successful based on the high rates of participation, the anecdotal feedback received, and the continued desire to order t-shirts after the week ended. Throughout the week, we proved that research can be fun and is an important part of making decisions and planning programs. We also learned the importance of communication, especially with professionals. Finally, we learned, and saw first hand, how a small group of people can influence our campus in a big way. Our hope is that the Women’s Awareness Week will continue as an annual tradition at Clemson University.

References

See printable version



Carrie DuPre
Clemson University
cpriddy@clemson.edu

Interculturalism as a Foundation for Helping Students Value Diversity

As colleges and universities grow in enrollment, administrators actively include diversity agendas in their growth plans (Castellanos, Gloria, Mayorga, & Salas, 2007). Yet while administrators reference diversity through the rhetoric of written mission statements and the increase in diversity enrollment statistics, there has been inadequate attention to understanding the complexity of multicultural issues (Pope, Reynolds, & Mueller, 2004). As we realize that student enrollment increasingly reflects diverse backgrounds (Jiang, 2006), we need to realize that simply adding to the numbers of students from diverse backgrounds is not sufficient in making a university open to diversity (Castellanos et al., 2007).

Brown (2002) identifies this as the difference between “statistical diversity,” or the demographics of a campus, and an “environment for diversity,” or the institutional goal of growing diversity (p. 1081). Simply enrolling a diverse student body does not equate to creating a truly diverse institution of higher education. One goal of the student affairs profession is to include diversity in a student’s higher education experience, yet there needs to be greater focus on how to train professionals to do so (Pope, Reynolds, & Mueller, 2004). Is there a framework that can address both student diversity development and the way in which student affairs professionals consider diversity when working with students?

Perhaps the answer lies within interculturalism, or the idea of “sharing and learning across cultures with the aim of promoting understanding, equity, harmony, and justice in a diverse society” (Intercultural Framework, 2008). This idea goes further than the idea of multiculturalism, which simply refers to the respectful coexistence of different cultures (Kymalicka, 2003). Interculturalism in education is not a new concept in regard to how teachers teach, yet traditionally it has entailed only inclusion of cultures in lesson plans (Lee, 2005). Of course, to make such a concept work, it is important to first assess the culture of the university; if the culture is not one that would support such open attention to diversity, any diversity programs presented to the student body might end in failure (Brown, 2002). To make this idea effective in the college environment and to truly create an atmosphere that supports understanding of diversity, I argue that interculturalism should go beyond lesson plans to include intentional dialogues and interactions between people of different cultures. This is where student affairs plays a critical role.

Pope and Reynolds (1997) recognize the need for student affairs professionals to acquire skills for effectively working with a diverse student body. To help build the concept of multicultural competence (which, by the definition previously mentioned, would be included in intercultural competence) in college students and to give student affairs professionals direction in working with students, the two researchers created a list of core student affairs competencies; the list includes elements like administration, theory, and ethics, but most relevant to this discussion are the elements of “teaching and training” and “multicultural awareness, knowledge, and skills” (Pope-Davis, Coleman, Liu, & Toporek, 2003, p. 366). Pope and Reynolds elaborate on this second element by stressing the importance of students to have “the ability to identify and openly discuss cultural differences and issues” (p. 271), involving both sharing differences and growing by openly addressing those differences. With these two core competencies in mind, I offer two categories in which student affairs professionals can intentionally help students value diversity: meaningful discussions and community service.

Fostering Meaningful Discussions

A central element of interculturalism involves critical thinking and the comprehension that
“diversity in and of itself is of little value unless we can enhance communication among diverse individuals and groups” (Lee, 2005, p. 202). Student affairs professionals must realize that social pressures make it difficult for students to let their beliefs emerge, so open discussion is necessary to deal with and overcome such pressures; in our society, this can be especially difficult because agreement is valued and divergence is not (Opotow, 1990). For meaningful dialogue to take place, participants should be open to wherever the conversation takes them and understand that different does not mean bad—it simply means different (Roose, 2001). These might seem like elementary concepts, yet I believe starting with these reminders is important when working with college-aged students.

Kegan’s (1994) model of lifespan development reminds us that students go through a “self-authorship” phase as a way to organize their lives and act as the authors—not just the actors—in their lives, balancing outside influences with internal factors (p. 185). In other words, students are still figuring out who they are and might benefit from such elementary reminders, particularly as they enter college environment comprised of people from numerous backgrounds. One option when approaching discussions is to use trained undergraduate students to lead reflections (Ash & Clayton, 2004); having this peer-to-peer leadership might help students experiencing this self-authoring phase feel more comfortable being open in their sharing of thoughts.

Meaningful discussions can occur on their own as activities marketing with titles such as “discussion of diversity issues on campus,” but morel likely they can be integrated into other activities on campus, chiefly through reflection at the completion of programs or events. Reflection is a process that allows a person to “integrate the understanding gained into one’s experience in order to enable better choices or actions in the future as well as enhance one’s overall effectiveness” (Rogers, 2001, p. 41). Even when experiencing the same activity, people generate different conclusions; engaging in collective reflection can bring together these multiple perspectives to increase learning (Mündel & Schugurensky, 2008). So as college campuses gain greater statistical diversity in their student bodies, the discussions will provide increasingly diverse perspectives, allowing reflection discussions to positively impact a student’s diversity awareness.

Community Service

People who live an intercultural life are curious about other cultures, want to learn new ways of life, and are open to looking at issues from another person’s point of view (Kymlicka, 2003). Community service provides opportunities to satisfy all three of these characteristics, as well as support other aspects of student development and success. Astin and Antonio (2000) found that the activities in which students participate while in college have a great impact on their character development, identifying volunteering as one such activity. Astin and Sax (1998) related serving the community with also positively influencing student retention. In addition, we see that serving the community provides students with an education in diversity; students who engage in domestic service projects—without even leaving this county—have been shown to have greater cultural competencies than those who do not (Miller & Gonzalez, 2009). Students can learn from their peers and from the people whom they serve. Their perspective can broaden a bit more than if they never went out into their community to participate in service activities. Considering how busy a college student’s schedule becomes with classes, homework, student organizations, and social activities, they could use support from student affairs professionals to take the initiative to organize service activities. This could include offering a website with local agencies that need volunteers, organizing service events for students like cleaning up a local park, and giving students the resources and support to form Relay for Life teams. Outside of organizing service activities, collaboration with faculty who incorporate service learning projects in their classes could be beneficial for students, as we see that participation in such projects increases students’ diversity awareness and appreciation (Simons & Cleary, 2006). Once organized, convincing students to participate in the activities should be an increasingly easy task: the Corporation for National and Community Service reports that the number of college students who engage in volunteer work increased by approximately 20 percent between 2002 and 2005, and that in 2008 69.7 percent of first-year college students believed that it is essential or very important to offer help to others in need—the highest rate for this belief since 1970. The Corporation also reports that the volunteerism rate for college students in South Carolina is 28 percent, ranking our state 39th among all states. And these rates are sure to grow. Mainstream media has already pointed to the impact of the Barack Obama presidential campaign as proving to students that they matter in social matters and inspiring them to serve their communities (Stone, 2009). Given the Millenial Generation’s sense of social responsibility (Howe & Strauss, 2000), community service appears to be a viable way to support college students in their efforts to reaching out to other cultures.

Conclusion

To maximize the potential of interculuralism on college campuses, the idea must broaden beyond class curriculum and into student affairs practices like meaningful discussions and planned community service activities, though this broadening is not without its limitations. One main limitation for any diversity-related initiative looks at the reverse of inclusion: when we identify with traits that contribute to how we see ourselves (such as race and gender), we not only align ourselves with those who are like us, but we also create fragmentation in society by encouraging exclusion from those who are not like us (Brown, 2002). This realization does not mean that diversity efforts should be halted; it simply means that administrators, particularly student affairs professionals who work closely with students, should be aware of possible negative effects of well-intended diversity efforts. Based on the interactive nature of interculturalism and its focus on dialogue among individuals, campuses might also watch for negative effects in some students simply based on the chance of their discussion or activity group. Dominant individuals in a discussion could heavily sway others with their dominant voices (Abdallah-Pretceille, 2006).

Despite these limitations, the broadening of interculturalism does provide a foundation that helps student affairs professionals understand their role in the diversity development of the students with which they work. As diversity will undoubtedly continue to grow as a topic of great attention on college campuses, attention to how to deal with students and their diversity development will also undoubtedly grow. Yet even as new theories are created for addressing diversity, I believe the fundamental elements of interculturalism—dialogue among different groups and learning across cultures—will continue to be essential.

References

See printable version